Ranting and Raving

posted: January 27th, 2012 05:31 pm | 10Comments

Recently, I heard through a reader that KFI was reporting one of my stories — the dumped dirty adult diaper one — and attributed it to a CdM “blogger.”

I resist the use of that term to describe what I do, preferring journalist to blogger and online news site to blog.

Now, many of you might call me a blogger, or this site a blog. That doesn’t really bother me, because it’s not used insultingly or demeaningly.

However, when a major media player calls me a blogger, I usually correct them. And this time, I did. I emailed the news director and asked that he please call me a journalist in the future.

I expected a nice response, perhaps apologizing and promising to make that change if it ever came up again. Instead, I received a snippy duo of emails, and in the end, I was told that if I have a Ranter and Raver page, then I’ll never be more than a blogger. And they would never quote me again. Because I’m not reliable. I’m a blogger, meaning I rant and rave and am illegitimate somehow in my reporting, I guess is what he meant.

I did not respond — why bother? But then another reporter in town, who also doesn’t want to be called a blogger by the way — said he agreed. That this very page, on which I express opinions, keeps me in blogger-label-land instead of in serious-journalism-land.

I gathered from his comments left on the CdM Today Facebook page that if I label this page “Opinion” or “Editorial” instead of Amy the Ranter/Amy the Raver, that it would somehow be OK.

I reject all of that.

First of all, I rarely rant or rave about anything that is a news item. I don’t rant about animal rights. I don’t rave about chickens. I don’t rant or rave about political candidates, the superintendent, the airport noise — none of it. I typically rant about bad parkers and stupid things I find myself doing. And I really think that you, my readers, are intelligent enough to know that anything on my Rant/Rave page is an opinion, not fact, not a news article.

Sometimes, I think I manage to be a little funny.

In any case, I tried very hard since this entire incident went down to forget it, to move onward and upward, not to let the haters bring me down.

Yet, I’ve realized that I have had very little desire to Rant/Rave since then. I wonder if I’d be better off losing this page. Would you all take me more seriously? Would the other professionals out there?

I don’t think I’ll be making any changes — but maybe I should. Maybe I should call this page “Opinion.”

Maybe Frank’s column on Saturdays should say, “Cycling Safety: An Opinion Column.”

I don’t ever want you to be fooled. Most of my work on this site is news or news features. I’ve been told I should be lighter in my tone, breezier. But I want to write in a way that conveys accuracy, sincerity, truth.

I regularly re-read the Journalist’s Creed — and I check myself against it and try always to measure up.

I’m hoping that this will blow over, and soon I’ll be ranting again about trash cans and loud talkers and pushy parents and people who jog shirtless.

Just wanted, in the meantime, to let you know why the long break.

10 Responses to “Ranting and Raving”

Comments

Leave a comment