Cycling Safety

posted: February 26th, 2011 06:48 am | 5Comments

By Frank Peters

At Tuesday’s City Council meeting agenda included a staff report that proposed the status of many City Committees, including the Bike Safety Committee. Out of the 16 committees listed, most were nominated for “Sunset” disposition. The Bike Safety Committee was categorized as “Sunset after 2011.”

Maybe the Bike Safety Committee just got swept up in a move to thin the ranks of distracting committees; only the Aviation, Coastal-Bay Water Quality and Harbor Commission Committees escaped the proposed axe.

It seems a little abrupt. Maybe the excellent attendance by City staff is a burden, but it’s only 90 minutes a month.

I could also make a case for five years of work ahead of the Committee.

Follow the money: the City’s claiming poverty while $131 million goes towards the new City Hall. I was shot down at the last meeting when I asked for a “Share the Road” sign along the Bayside Drive Sharrows: “no money.” What I wished I had said in reply, “How much, I’ll pay for it!” but that thought came the next day. (The offer is still good.)

Then ten days ago a multi-university research report released in Montreal, describes how cyclists are safer and more comfortable when physically separated from traffic (see Cyclists shouldn’t ’share the road’). I suppose today, we all wish there was such a route along San Joaquin Hills Road. For the sake of avoiding future tragedies, where will we start? And when? Who among our City leaders will call for such improvements and how will we find the money?

Seattle’s Peter Lagerwey suggests that we begin our bike safety improvements by modifying our planning procedures: “get the words ‘bicycle’ and ‘walking’ into the the general transportation plan, or else you spin your wheels with ad-hoc projects and never get ahead.” The Committee hasn’t even considered this advice.

Long Beach has grant money to fund their ambitions, and look at what they’ve accomplished! Funding for 2,000 bike racks and total street redesigns for bicycles, like New York has done along Ninth Avenue. Have we considered how to get started on such an approach? Instead we seemingly sit on our hands, lamenting a lack of staff time and money.

Shut down the Committee? Why not? So long as a more potent derivative of activism rises up to take its place. This is how I understand Portland succeeds. It’s Bicycle Transportation Alliance works tirelessly to advocate for change, over decades, and the turnover of any single City Council makeup.

The Bike Safety Committee is dead! Long live the Bike Safety Committee!

5 Responses to “Cycling Safety”

Comments

Leave a comment